| Re:Und endlich "Gamerscore" als soziale Währung! |  |
>>Was ich natürlich nicht gut finde, also Chinas gläsernes Social-Credit-System oder wie das heißt (auch wenn man grundsätzlich eine gute Intention attestieren könnte).
>
>Nur gibt es so ein System in China aktuell nicht (mal von irgendwelchen Testballons abgesehen) - im Gegensatz zu den Horrorgeschichten die man bei uns in schöner Regelmäßigkeit seit Jahren darüber lesen muss. Geschichten über etwas von dem niemand weiß ob es jemals kommen wird (diese Idee hatte ja irgendjemand 2014(?)), geschweige denn wie es dann gestaltet wird.
Nunja, es existiert nicht so, wie wir uns das hier vorstellen oder wir es in den Horrorgeschichten (heute show und co, ist natürlich überspitzt) lesen.
Das es nicht existiert ist aber auch wieder nicht richtig.
Nehmen wir doch einfach Mal seriöse Berichte, z.B. vom größten China Think Tank in der EU: Merics
[https://merics.org/en/report/chinas-social-credit-system-2021-fragmentation-towards-integration]
Key Findings
-The Social Credit System is part of Xi Jinping's vision for data-driven governance. Government organs across regions and administrative levels should join hands to create a coherent information ecosystem. Data-sharing challenges continue to hamper this effort.
-The Social Credit System is a highly flexible tool that can quickly be applied to address new policy priorities. During the Covid-19 pandemic, government agencies rapidly issued a slew of directives to implement pandemic-related regulations.
-The flexibility of the system also comes at a cost: fragmentation. The Social Credit System is regulated by thousands of documents, but there is no clear definition of “credit” and substantial regional differences exist in implementation and evaluation standards.
-The uneven implementation presents risks for individuals and companies alike. They have to navigate various regulations, lists and rating systems. There is an acute risk of “credit” becoming an arbitrary term that can be applied with disproportionate punishments.
-The Chinese government is aware of these issues and has initiated steps to more clearly define “social credit”, establish practises and improve measures for credit repair. Work on a Social Credit Law has started, but it may take years until core mechanisms become standardised nationwide.
-The private tech sector continues to be excluded from the development of the official Social Credit System. But payment and consumer platforms like Alibaba’s Sesame Credit have created their own trust-rating initiatives.
-The Social Credit System remains the least digitised of China’s tech-driven monitoring and surveillance initiatives. It relies heavily on human investigations, reports, and decisions. This also leaves room for traditional vectors of individual and political influence.
-The party state will further build up, streamline and integrate digital monitoring and surveillance activities. More invasive domestic security platforms and initiatives have advanced rapidly and with significantly fewer limitations than the Social Credit System
----------------------
Gesendet mit M! v.2.7.0