| Re:Buzzfeed killt möglicherweise Mueller Untersuchung |  |
>>>>Zudem wurde das Thema in einigen politische Sendungen diskutiert und die Probleme, die daraus entstanden sind.
>>>
>>>In welchen Sendungen?
>>
>>Troll doch bitte woanders. "Angst" ist nicht belegbar (aber ob es dir darum überhaupt geht, bezweifle ich), aber eindeutig lesbar ist das hier in der WP:
>>
>>A person could count the times Mueller has publicly commented on the investigation with one hand. After dozens of stories, some that seemed to stray from the facts, he remained silent. Why, then, did Mueller opt to issue a statement on Friday?
>>
>>Legal experts posited Mueller would have preferred to say nothing, but he feared specifics of the BuzzFeed story would be imputed to the investigation.
>>
>>According to BuzzFeed’s report, prosecutors had evidence that Trump directed his former attorney, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress, an action that could meet the definition of the “high crime or misdemeanor” needed to initiate impeachment proceedings. It could also support independent felony charges.
>>
>>[Nancy Pelosi says Trump is not immune from indictment. Some legal experts agree.]
>>
>>Mueller’s statement tamped down the political speculation that followed the original story, yet he offered no added insight to whether there were criminal charges to come.
>>
>>Former acting attorney general Stuart Gerson called the statement “an anomaly.”
>>He said, “Mueller’s staff must have felt that action might be taken in the House on the basis of this, or that it might affect the testimony of present and future witnesses."
>
>Alles schoen und gut, aber wo steht da irgendetwas davon, dass der Buzzfeed News Kram die Mueller Untersuchung “killt”?
>
>Melanie
"Killed" im Sinne von: "might affect the testimony of present and future witnesses" --> wenn du keine Zeugen mehr kriegst oder die sich dreimal überlegen, was sie sagen, ist die Untersuchung sinnlos.