| Re:Hier mal was ernstzunehmendes dazu |  |
>Von tatsächlichen Experten auf dem Gebiet:
>
>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095063/]
>
>„It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is optimized for binding to human ACE2 with an efficient solution different from those previously predicted7,11. Furthermore, if genetic manipulation had been performed, one of the several reverse-genetic systems available for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used19. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone20. Instead, we propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer. We also discuss whether selection during passage could have given rise to SARS-CoV-2.“
Ah, Technobabble! Als völlig Ahnungslosen überzeugt mich das komplett, das klingt schon rein gefühlsmässig so, als ob es stimmen müsste. ;)