Thema: |
|
||
Autor: | SidVicious (deaktiviert) | ||
Datum: | 19.02.21 07:55 | ||
Antwort auf: | Virus doch aus dem Labor? von thestraightedge | ||
Von tatsächlichen Experten auf dem Gebiet: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095063/] „It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is optimized for binding to human ACE2 with an efficient solution different from those previously predicted7,11. Furthermore, if genetic manipulation had been performed, one of the several reverse-genetic systems available for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used19. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone20. Instead, we propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer. We also discuss whether selection during passage could have given rise to SARS-CoV-2.“ |
|||
Antworten nicht möglich, siehe Info neben Nickname |