| Re:Dafür +1 |  |
>>dann würden Frauen auch endlich mal sehen wie sie in der Jobwelt abgezockt werden.
>
> [https://s12.directupload.net/images/200428/45kukx7q.jpg]
>---
>Gesendet mit Android-Client v1.0.5
Zu der Grafik:
Warum arbeiten Frauen weniger, mit Unterbrechungen, steigen später ein usw.? Die Grafik beantwortet das an einer Stelle selbst: weil sie sich um Kinder und Pflege kümmern, sie erledigen Reproduktions- oder Care-Arbeit.
Dann kommt die Grafik dazu, dass der Lohnunterschied da ist, aber doch gar nicht so hoch, weil:
- sie weniger Überstunden machen. Auch hier: könnte das nicht evtl. daran liegen, dass immer noch das Meiste an ihnen hängen bleibt, s. o.?
- sie schlechter verhandeln: Nö. Hier ne Yale-Studie aus dem wissenschaftl. Feld:
Despite efforts to recruit and retain more women, a stark gender disparity persists within academic science. Abundant research has demonstrated gender bias in many demographic groups, but has yet to experimentally investigate whether science faculty exhibit a bias against female students that could contribute to the gender disparity in academic science. In a randomized double-blind study (n = 127), science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student—who was randomly assigned either a male or female name—for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student. Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants’ preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science.
[https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/14/1211286109]
- Dass Männer früher sterben (weil sie oft gesundheitsschädigendere Berufe machen stimmt auf jeden Fall.
Woher ist die Grafik denn?