Thema: |
|
||
Autor: | _bla_ | ||
Datum: | 23.04.20 13:33 | ||
Antwort auf: | Und 97,2% in der Altersklasse 65+ von Sloane | ||
>"Mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively. Mortality rates for those in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups who did not receive mechanical ventilation were 19.8% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no deaths in the younger-than-18 age group. The overall length of stay was 4.1 days (IQR, 2.3-6.8). The median postdischarge follow-up time was 4.4 days (IQR, 2.2-9.3)." > >Deckt sich das mit den Erfahrungen aus anderen Ländern Bei diesen Statistiken fragt man sich ja, ob die older-than-65 Gruppe nicht bessere Chancen gehabt hätte, wenn sie einfach nur Sauerstoff bekommen hätte. |
|||
< antworten > | |||