| Da steht leider sehr viel Quatsch drin. |  |
"Endgame tries to put a new twist on time travel, as per Hulk and Nebula explaining to Scott and Rhody that time travel movies like Back to the Future are bullshit. Their theory is if you travel to the past and change something, the future you return to would be a different future, not the one you returned from. Which makes sense. But then in Endgame, they do exactly that. Multiple times."
Das verstehe ich nicht. In Endgame funktioniert Zeitreise doch tatsächlich anders als in BttF?
"Guardians of the Galaxy clearly establishes that normal beings can’t simply just hold Infinity Stones in their hands."
Falsch. Das gilt nur für den Power Stone. Die ganzen weiteren Schlussfolgerungen und Theorien dazu von Gizmodo sind Käse.
"In order to help the Avengers, Gamora and 2023 Nebula try to convince 2014 Nebula to get on board with betraying Thanos. She struggles but ultimately refuses, so 2023 Nebula kills her. Now, you may think that should have killed 2023 Nebula too. And, in other time travel movies, maybe it would have. Endgame makes it very clear though that traditional time travel rules aren’t being followed here."
Hä? Jetzt also doch? Wie viele Autoren hatte der Artikel? :-D
"We are left to assume that either she disappeared with Tony’s snap (unlikely) or she ran off somewhere with 2023 Nebula, which could be possibly be resolved in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3."
Nein. Nebula ist am Ende des Films an Bord der Benatar mit Thor und den anderen Guardians zu sehen.
"Two of the only unsnapped heroes who don’t fight in the big final battle are Hank Pym and Janet Van Dyne"
Auch das ist falsch. Beide werden zu Beginn des Films im Avengers HQ als "gesnapped" gezeigt, als die überlebenden Avengers realisieren, dass Thanos genau das getan hat, was er angekündigt hatte.