| Mal was zum nachlesen, für alle die es interessiert |  |
A Critical Analysis of Leaving Neverland (alles andere auf der Seite ist ebenfalls lesenswert, inkl. etlicher Quellenangaben):
[https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2019/02/25/a-critical-analysis-of-leaving-neverland/]
Tom Mesereau Defends Michael Jackson post 'Leaving Neverland'
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRBOn0czZdM]
Michael Jackson Rebuttal (Part 3) - unbedingt auch P1+2 gucken:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYx0vLfpRYY&feature=youtu.be]
Der Typ ist auch auf Twitter on-fire und kennt die Faktenlage.
Charles Thomson (Ray Fitzwalter Award for Investigative Journalism)
[https://twitter.com/CEThomson]
Forbes: What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary
[https://www.forbes.com/sites/joevogel/2019/01/29/what-you-should-know-about-the-new-michael-jackson-documentary/amp/?__twitter_impression=true]
Brandi Jackson:
[https://twitter.com/BJackson82/status/1095067045454966784]
What Leaving Neverland doesn’t tell you about Michael Jackson and his accusers (inkl. Qullenangaben):
[https://www.mike-smallcombe.com/post/the-lies-of-michael-jackson-leaving-neverland-accusers]
Paar Auszüge:
Weitzman said Robson’s book told a completely different story of how he was first abused by Jackson. When asked about some of these discrepancies at his deposition, Robson explained that his memories had “evolved” since writing the draft of the book in late 2012 and early 2013.[xvii]
--
Safechuck, meanwhile, claimed in his sworn declaration that he was first abused on the Paris leg of the Bad Tour in late June 1988.[xxi]
He later said that after the tour ended, Jackson flew him out to New York “in February 1989” where Jackson was performing at the Grammy’s. Safechuck stated that he was abused on this trip.
However, the Grammy’s were not in New York in 1989; they were in Los Angeles that year and Jackson did not perform.
Jackson did perform at the Grammy’s in New York in February 1988, before Safechuck claims he was first abused.[xxii]
--
In the documentary, Safechuck also makes a claim that he refused to testify for Jackson in the 2005 trial. However, neither Jackson nor his legal team could have called Safechuck as a witness, as the judge ruled that ‘evidence as to Jimmy Safechuck will not be permitted’.[xxiii]
--
Mrs Robson added that she was especially upset because Jackson had taken another boy and his family on the tour.
Footage of the boy, Brett Barnes, and Jackson on the Dangerous World Tour was then shown. Robson then said that was when he realised he had been “replaced” by that boy. Any reasonable viewer would interpret that to mean that Jackson was also sexually abusing Barnes on the tour.
In the documentary, a brief written denial from Barnes features on the screen.
Barnes is said to be considering suing HBO, alleging that Leaving Neverland insinuates he was abused by Jackson.[xxix] He was also not consulted about his inclusion in the film.
Barnes wrote on Twitter: “Not only do we have to deal with these lies, but we’ve also got to deal with people perpetuating these lies.
“The fact that they fail to do the small amount of research it takes to prove these are lies, by choice or not, makes it even worse.”[xxx]
--
Weitzman said: “For example, in order to try to get around the statute of limitations for monetary claims against the Estate, Robson testified under oath that ‘prior to March 4, 2013, I did not understand or was even aware that an Estate had been opened for administration’.”[xiii]
The attorney said this was “a lie”, as Robson had in fact met with John Branca, one of the Estate’s executors, in 2011 in his failed effort to solicit work with the Estate on a Michael Jackson-themed Cirque du Soleil show.[xiv]
Weitzman added: “The trial judge found one of Robson’s lies so incredible that the trial judge disregarded Robson’s sworn declaration and found that no rational trier of fact could possibly believe Robson’s sworn statements.”[xv]