| Re:Gnarf |  |
>>Hmm, der BD Film würde mich wirklich interessieren.
>
>Soll aber leider auch nicht der Überhammer sein:
>
>[http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1674/ghostbusters.html]
>
>Wenn man die DVD schon hat, kann man sich die BD wohl sparen...
>
>mcdee
Ich les da was ganz anderes. Bildqualität 3 1/2 von vier möglichen Sternen:
"On the bright side, though, side-to-side comparisons reveal the Blu-ray a clear winner with improved clarity and resolution, and a much sharper image overall compared to other standard definition counterparts. The color palette also receives a pleasant upgrade, displaying nice saturation in the primaries and accurate secondary hues. Architectural details are a nice treat to look at, especially at a distance, with the weatherization of the exterior of buildings and many of their intricacies clearly visible. There are a few scenes throughout that appear soft, but obviously inherent to the photography and the film's age rather than a transfer weakness. The image also possesses an appreciable depth of field that adds to the '80s film-like quality."
"Of all previous versions released over the years, including a laserdisc that Ivan Reitman has publicly rejected, this high-definition version is the best 'Ghostbusters' has ever looked. There is no doubt about that, and many will be pleased with the upgrade."